Machine Learning-Assisted Pool Boiling Parameter Prediction

Authors

  • Doğan Çiloğlu Dr.
  • Misra Yilmaz

Keywords:

Boiling heat transfer coefficient;, critical heat flux, machine learning, support vector regression, gradient boosting

Abstract

In this study, the pool boiling behavior of n-pentane fluid on different metallic surfaces was investigated using experimental and machine learning-based approaches. Copper, aluminum, and stainless-steel substrates were used in the experimental studies; for each surface, the uncoated condition and three different nickel coating concentrations were evaluated. Surface characterization included measurements of average surface roughness and contact angle; boiling performance was analyzed using surface superheat, heat flux, heat transfer coefficient (h), onset of nucleate boiling (ONB), and critical heat flux (CHF) parameters. Experimental results showed that nickel-coated surfaces generally reduced the onset of nucleate boiling, allowed the same heat flux to be achieved at lower surface superheat, and improved the CHF behavior, especially on aluminum and copper surfaces. Changes in surface roughness and contact angle were found to have significant effects on boiling performance. Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were developed to estimate heat flux and heat transfer coefficient using an experimental dataset. In the revised model structure, ΔT, material type, surface type, nickel concentration, Ra, and contact angle were used as machine learning inputs, while pressure and saturation temperature were treated only as fixed experimental conditions. For heat transfer coefficient prediction, the primary model was reconstructed without q″ as an input variable to reduce direct information leakage from the defining relation h = q″/ΔT. The q″-included h model was retained only as a secondary consistency case. Model performance was evaluated using R², RMSE, MAE, and MAPE metrics. The results showed that the SVR model provided the most successful performance in estimating h, while the Gradient Boosting model provided higher accuracy in estimating heat flux. Furthermore, the risk of overly optimistic performance, which might arise from including experimental points of the same surface in both training and test sets, was reduced by using a group-based cross-validation approach. This study evaluates the coating-material-boiling performance relationship in n-pentane pool boiling within an experimental and AI-supported framework by integrating surface characterization parameters with data-based modeling.

References

Liang G, Mudawar I. Pool boiling critical heat flux (CHF) – Part 2: Assessment of models and correlations. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2018) 117:1368–1383. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.09.073.

Zhang Y, Chen G, Du K, Li S, Liu J, Chen F, et al. Review of recent advancing pool boiling heat transfer through surface engineering. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (2026) 230:116734. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2026.116734.

Liu B, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Wu Z, Pham A, Wang W, et al. Pool boiling heat transfer of N-pentane on micro/nanostructured surfaces. International Journal of Thermal Sciences (2018) 130:386–394. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.05.012.

O'Hanley H, Coyle C, Buongiorno J, McKrell T, Hu L-W, Rubner M, et al. Separate effects of surface roughness, wettability, and porosity on the boiling critical heat flux. Applied Physics Letters (2013) 103(2):24102. doi:10.1063/1.4813450.

Qi S, Han B, Zhu X, Yang B-W, Xing T, Liu A, et al. Machine learning in critical heat flux studies in nuclear systems: A detailed review. Progress in Nuclear Energy (2025) 179:105535. doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2024.105535.

Upot NV, Fazle Rabbi K, Khodakarami S, Ho JY, Kohler Mendizabal J, Miljkovic N. Advances in micro and nanoengineered surfaces for enhancing boiling and condensation heat transfer: a review. Nanoscale advances (2023) 5(5):1232–1270. doi:10.1039/d2na00669c.

Li J, Huang Y, Qiu Y, Wang S, Yang Q, Wang K, et al. Prediction of critical heat flux using different methods: A review from empirical correlations to the cutting-edge machine learning. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (2025) 160:108362. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2024.108362.

Swartz B, Wu L, Zhou Q, Hao Q. Machine learning predictions of critical heat fluxes for pillar-modified surfaces. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2021) 180:121744. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121744.

Ma B, Zhao Z, Sun M, Liu B. Machine learning-based prediction of nucleate pool boiling heat transfer enhancement on micropillar surfaces. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer (2025) 166:109116. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2025.109116.

Liang G, Mudawar I. Review of pool boiling enhancement by surface modification. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2019) 128:892–933. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.09.026.

Kandlikar SG. A Theoretical Model to Predict Pool Boiling CHF Incorporating Effects of Contact Angle and Orientation. Journal of Heat Transfer (2001) 123(6):1071–1079. doi:10.1115/1.1409265.

Moghadasi H, Malekian N, Saffari H, Mirza Gheitaghy A, Zhang GQ. Recent Advances in the Critical Heat Flux Amelioration of Pool Boiling Surfaces Using Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Deposition. Energies (2020) 13(15):4026. doi:10.3390/en13154026.

Betz AR, Jenkins J, Kim C-J“, Attinger D. Boiling heat transfer on superhydrophilic, superhydrophobic, and superbiphilic surfaces. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2013) 57(2):733–741. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.10.080.

Hastie T. The elements of statistical learning: Data mining, inference, and prediction. S.l.: Springer-Verlag (2009). 758 p.

Rashidi MM, Alhuyi Nazari M, Harley C, Momoniat E, Mahariq I, Ali N. Applications of machine learning methods for boiling modeling and prediction: A comprehensive review. Chemical Thermodynamics and Thermal Analysis (2022) 8:100081. doi:10.1016/j.ctta.2022.100081.

Mehdi S, Borumand M, Hwang G. Accurate and robust predictions of pool boiling heat transfer with micro-structured surfaces using probabilistic machine learning models. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer (2024) 226:125487. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2024.125487.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-15

How to Cite

Machine Learning-Assisted Pool Boiling Parameter Prediction. (2026). International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews, 10(1), 29-44. https://www.injirr.com/article/view/262

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >>