A Numerical Simulation and Aerodynamic Investigation of Air Flow around Supersonic Airfoil Profiles


Supersonic Airfoil
Numerical Simulation
Aerodynamic Coefficients
ANSYS Fluent

How to Cite

YEŞİLYURT, M. K., MUSTAFAOĞLU, M., & ÖNER, İlhan V. (2022). A Numerical Simulation and Aerodynamic Investigation of Air Flow around Supersonic Airfoil Profiles. International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews, 6(2), 113–120. Retrieved from http://www.injirr.com/./index.php/injirr/article/view/125/index.php/injirr/article/view/125


In this study, flow field analysis was performed to determine the aerodynamic coefficients
for the SC36210 and NACA0018 airfoil profiles in supersonic compressible flow at 2 Mach. During this analysis, ANSYS Fluent, and geometric modeling was used. Numerical simulation of flow was made by K-ω Transition turbulence model. Change in the attack angle versus the divergence angle of airfoil surface profile was examined for elastic flexible SC series. According to the results, as the Mach number of the free flow increases, the aerodynamic coefficient values decrease. In addition, Elastic flexible airfoil profiles for use in supersonic wings have higher performance advantages compared to SC36210 and NACA0018 series airfoils.



Du S, Ang H. Design and feasibility analyses of morphing airfoil used to control flight attitude. Strojniški vestnik-Journal of Mechanical Engineering (2012) 58(1):46–55.

Dileep E, Nebish M, Loganathan V. Aerodynamic Performance Optimization of Smart Wing Using SMA Actuator. Research Journal of Recent Sciences (2013) 2277:2502.

Combes TP, Malik AS, Bramesfeld G, McQuilling MW. Efficient fluid-structure interaction method for conceptual design of flexible, fixed-wing micro-air-vehicle wings. AIAA Journal (2015) 53(6):1442–1454.

Morphing trailing edges with shape memory alloy rods (2010).

Şahin HL, Yaman Y. Synthesis, Analysis, and Design of a Novel Mechanism for the Trailing Edge of a Morphing Wing. Aerospace (2018) 5(4):127.

Barbarino S, Bilgen O, Ajaj RM, Friswell MI, Inman DJ. A review of morphing aircraft. Journal of intelligent material systems and structures (2011) 22(9):823–877.

Fincham JH, Friswell MI. Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil. Aerospace Science and technology (2015) 43:245–255.

Yates Jr EC. AGARD standard aeroelastic configurations for dynamic response I-Wing 445.6 (1988).

Susuz U. Aeroelastic analysis of an unmanned aerial vehicle (2008). 120 International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews 6(2) 113-120.

Liu F, Cai J, Zhu Y, Tsai HM, Wong AS. Calculation of wing flutter by a coupled fluid-structure method. Journal of Aircraft (2001) 38(2):334–342.

Comprehensive Simulation Evaluation of the AGARD 445.6 Weakened Model# 3 from a Test and Evaluation Perspective (2015). 0251 p.

Vigneshwaran G, Vijayaraghavan M, Sivamanikandan K, Keerthana K, Balaji K. Fluid-Structure Interaction Over an Aircraft Wing. Bd 13:27–31.

Goud TS, Kumar AS, Prasad SS. Analysis of fluid-structure interaction on an aircraft wing: Analysis (2014).

Khalaji MN, Aliihsan K, Kotcioğlu İ. Investigation of numerical analysis velocity contours k-ε model of RNG, standard and realizable turbulence for different geometries. International Journal of Innovative Research and Reviews (2019) 3(2):29–34.

Fincham JH, Friswell MI. Aerodynamic optimisation of a camber morphing aerofoil. Aerospace Science and technology (2015) 43:245–255.

Sahu S, Nourani V, Shanker U, Shanker R, Kumari V, Bansal KK, et al. Dr. Shiv K Sahu.

Xie X, Cao L, Huang H. Thickened boundary layer theory for air film drag reduction on a van body surface. AIP Advances (2018) 8(5):55129.

Tay WB, Lim KB. Numerical analysis of active chordwise flexibility on the performance of non-symmetrical flapping airfoils. Journal of Fluids and Structures (2010) 26(1):74–91.

Pederzani J, Haj-Hariri H. Numerical analysis of heaving flexible airfoils in a viscous flow. AIAA Journal (2006) 44(11):2773–2779.

Bazilevs Y, Takizawa K, Tezduyar TE. Computational fluidstructure interaction: methods and applications: John Wiley & Sons (2013).

Donea J, Huerta A, Ponthot JP, Rodríguez-Ferran A. ch 14: Wiley New York (2004). p. 1–25.

Benra F-K, Dohmen HJ, Pei J, Schuster S, Wan B. A comparison of one-way and two-way coupling methods for numerical analysis of fluid-structure interactions. Journal of applied mathematics (2011) 2011.

The authors keep the copyrights of the published materials with them, but the authors are aggee to give an exclusive license to the publisher that transfers all publishing and commercial exploitation rights to the publisher. The puslisher then shares the content published in this journal under CC BY-NC-ND license.